Tuesday, 3 June 2014

Exhibition Review. “World Press Photo Awards” (Royal Festival Hall, London, visited 16 November 2013)

World Press Photo is an independent, Dutch, non-profit organisation that holds an annual competition to choose the best photographs taken from around the world by photo-journalists. Following selection of the winning images the exhibition tours the world, bringing the winning and short-listed entries to 45 countries. Over 100,000 photographs from over 5,000 photographers in 124 countries were submitted for the 2013 competition, making this one of the largest photographic competitions in the world.

More than 160 of the short-listed and winning entries were exhibited this year on level 2 of the Southbank Centre’s Royal Festival Hall. Unfortunately our visit coincided with a jazz concert and the hall was extremely busy, as was the area adjacent to the display boards, which were sited on two sides of the hall. As a consequence I found it quite difficult to get close enough to the photographs to read the captions or see fine detail: next year I must try to visit at a much quieter time! Nevertheless, I felt that the exhibition could have benefited from having more space: perhaps the National Theatre would have been a more appropriate venue, although some of the photographs are quite harrowing and may not be suitable for young viewers (although there seemed to be no age restrictions at the Royal Festival Hall in what was a free, open access exhibition).

There are several categories of entry, including sport (the 2012 London Olympic Games were covered), nature and portraits (staged and observed), but despite the impressive coverage of these areas the greatest interest was, inevitably, reserved for coverage of the world’s trouble spots, with the conflicts in Syria, Israel and the Palestinian territories, Afghanistan and Sudan taking centre stage. I visit this exhibition every year and always leave asking the question: which trouble spots will feature in next year’s exhibition? Wouldn’t it be great if I came to the exhibition in the future and there were no photographs available in these categories because war had ceased! The loss of a few photojournalists’ jobs would be a small price to pay…….
Back in the real world, Paul Hansen’s photograph of a group of men carrying the bodies of two dead children (killed in an indiscriminate Israeli missile strike) through the streets of Gaza City won first prize overall. Indeed, I was surprised at how many photographs of the brief flare-up in Gaza in 2012, in which over 100 Palestinians were killed by the Israelis, were on display whereas the Syrian conflict was not particularly well represented. Presumably the reasons for this relate to the relative ease of press access to different war zones.

Whilst the general news stories primarily related to harrowing tales of death, loss and destruction, other categories provided the viewer with some more uplifting stories. The London Olympics were, of course, well covered with some spectacular set piece scenes and thrilling action, but a personal favourite was Wei Seng Chen’s amazing action photograph “Joy at the End of the Run”, in which a competitor and his animals reach the end of a bull race in Sumatra, Indonesia.

Photo-journalism can, in the right hands, be an incredibly powerful means of transmitting news and carrying messages to a worldwide audience. With photographers from 124 countries participating in this year’s competition it really is truly global. The power of an image to provoke emotion is well demonstrated in this collection, as is the lasting importance of the still photograph in telling the stories that are happening all around us. However, I felt let down by the manner in which the exhibition was held: surely it deserves more space and a quieter venue than this.

Learning Points, Future Work and References:
The reasons why press photographers carry huge lenses around with them in many situations were very clear here: some of the action shots were stunning. Many of the individual winning entries also demonstrated the ability of the photographer to capture and then select the image that displays “The Decisive Moment” from perhaps the hundreds or thousands of images that they took of a particular event.



No comments:

Post a Comment