Final Thoughts

During the two years that I have been working on the “Your Own Portfolio” course my thoughts and views on the theory and practice of photographic art have changed considerably.

In particular, I have spent the entire course trying to merge my strong interest in the genre of wildlife / natural history photography with the demands of a practice in photographic fine art. This has proved to be very difficult. I have come to the conclusion that overlap occurs only in the field of documentary photography and photojournalism, where the impact of our society on wildlife (and vice versa) is portrayed. The works of Beltrá and Stirton (see my critical essay) are good examples of this.

Research, in the form of reading and multiple exhibition visits, has given me a much better understanding of how projects in the field of photographic fine art are conceived, developed and completed. Taking out a subscription for the “British Journal of Photography” has helped enormously in this regard, even if the content of much of the work described therein is of little general or photographic interest to me.

Working on a portfolio of images has caused me to finally move away from the idea that the purpose of a “good” photograph is to have aesthetic appeal, even if this is still an important requirement. Instead I am starting to look at themes and links between photographs as part of my work.

Instead of going out to take individual photographs I am now looking at creating photographic projects, with themes and subjects that are of interest to me.

I have invested in better equipment and will continue to upgrade, in order to be able to handle difficult photographic conditions better and to produce better results.

I have been helped by having a patient and understanding tutor, who has also provided much constructive criticism!

I feel more confident now than I did at the start of the course that I can make further progress as an active photographer, particularly in the documentary field.

I am still fighting, eight years on and into my sixties, to get that photography degree. One more course (hopefully) to go!

Final Reflections on the Major Project and YOP Course Work (18 September 2015)

It has taken me two years and, I estimate, around 1000 hours of study to complete the “Your Own Portfolio” course. Why have I taken so long and has the extra time (600 hours recommended) and effort been worthwhile? To answer these questions I need to look at how I navigated the course, review my mistakes and failings and consider what I have learnt.

In contrast to the level 1 and level 2 courses, where projects are largely imposed, the level 3 courses offer the photography student far greater freedom to explore their own photography-related ideas and concepts and to work in genres that particularly hold their interest. My major interest lies in the field of wildlife (particularly birds) and the environment and, away from my studies, photographing wildlife has for many years provided a major part of my photographic output. Having been somewhat frustrated by the very limited opportunity to incorporate wildlife footage into my earlier course work I was keen to select a wildlife-related topic for the major project. Encouraged by my tutor (who also has an interest in wildlife) I chose to look at man’s interactions with wild birds through the process of feeding them, and this formed the basis of my major project proposal, which is summarised below:

“My intention for the Major Project is to produce a portfolio of photographic images that both illustrate some of the many different ways in which we feed wild birds in Britain and explore the reasons for our actions. Our roles, both as individuals and within groups such as charitable organisations and businesses, will be covered. Crucially, the content of the images will be used to encourage consideration of both the motivation behind our desire to feed wild birds and the benefits that this action provides for the birds and, in particular, for us.”

The images produced would cover the genres of wildlife and (particularly) documentary photography and, after discussing the plans with my tutor, it was agreed that all my other assignment work (Assignments 1-3) would be used as preparation for the major project work.

During my first year of study, various factors influenced and changed my thoughts and project plans.

Firstly, I took out a subscription to the “British Journal of Photography” (BJP), the leading UK magazine that addresses the subject of contemporary photographic art. I also visited many more exhibitions of photographic art, both by leading practitioners and by final year photographic art students, than I had previously done. Through these media outlets I have developed a much greater understanding of how photographers in the art world create, develop and complete projects. I cannot pretend that I was inspired by most of the work that I saw; indeed, the motivation behind a lot of the work seemed rather obscure, but by the time I entered my second year of study I had a much clearer view of what was expected of me, as an art student.

Secondly, I started to feel uncomfortable about limiting my major project to covering what wild birds can do for us, even though my images of people feeding birds could provide a consistent set, with a clear visual link. A high percentage of photographic art focuses on people and I feel that we are becoming so obsessed with ourselves that we have forgotten that we are supposed to share the world with other life forms. I decided that I wanted to broaden the project to cover not just what wild birds do for us (and feeding wild birds is essentially for human gratification, as I hope my images in the first section of the project will demonstrate) but also what we do, both directly and indirectly, for wild birds. In this way I would be able to introduce the environmental issues that I feel so strongly about.

Initially I chose to integrate the images by alternating the photographs of people feeding birds with the much wider-ranging set of images (wildlife, landscape and/or documentary genres) relating to “what we do for wild birds”, which covered habitat loss and creation among other things. Whilst this ordering of images (which I used to produce a story board for Assignment 4) worked for me my tutor found it confusing and, after a discussion, we decided that I would split the major project work into two sections: “what birds do for us” (feeding the birds)- and “what we do for wild birds” (environmental issues). Furthermore, it was agreed that I should produce a multimedia (images, video and sound) presentation that would complement my image portfolio, both by providing a link between the two sections and by providing an overview of the project rationale. I decided that the photo book, which I had always planned to produce, would be a more rounded and balanced view of aspects of our relationship with wild birds than the multimedia presentation, which would be somewhat more subjective.

The work was completed according to the revised plan. On the negative side, changing direction and expanding the subject area cost me a lot of time and resulted in the production of an image portfolio that cannot readily be interpreted without the aid of the multimedia presentation. On the positive side, producing the multimedia presentation allowed me to acquire new skills in the use of video and sound which, in combination with my images, will be harnessed for future work. Furthermore, adding the second section has given me the opportunity to present photographic work on a subject that I feel passionate about: I was highly motivated to do this, which must be an advantage. The photo book, which is essentially a brief overview of the relationship between people and wild birds in the UK, is a permanent record of my course work.

I am happy to have been given the freedom to combine my keen interest in wildlife and the environment with my photographic output for this course. However, because of this I have found some difficulty in sticking to the remit of the major project, and I believe that I’ve taken the somewhat tenuous link between wildlife photography and photographic art (see my critical essay) as far as I can and as far as I want to go. In the future I plan to choose projects that develop other areas of photographic interest and provide more uniform, yet distinctive portfolios of images.

Final Status Report 8 September 2015

My portfolio of 22 images for the major project has now been printed, to A3 size, on Fuji “C-type” archival print paper. I sent five images each to two separate printers and compared the results. The prints that I obtained from “The Print Space”, a London printer, were both marginally sharper and also lighter in tone than those I received from the second printer, so I went with them. Although “The Print Space” offers a mail order service I chose to download the images on their premises, and return to pick up the prints a few hours later. In total, I spent over £300 on the prints and, when added to the cost of the portfolio box, storage sleeves and the cost of producing two photo books, this brings my total printing expenses in line with the original projected expenses of £450.

All that remains is for me to assemble and index my assignment files, tutor reports and logbook for submission both on disc and as hard copy, together with my prints (assignment prints other than those for the portfolio will be submitted at A4 size), my multimedia presentation and a copy of my photo book. I will update my blog with final thoughts and, as there is a large amount of material to be examined and I am aware that the assessors have limited time to look at each student’s work, I will also provide a concise explanatory note for the assessors, both on my blog (which acts as a primary source for the logbook) and in the hard copy presentation. All this will take time, but I intend to have the submission ready for handing in at the OCA offices on or around 23 September.

Status Report 24 August 2015: Major Project Update and Preparation for Assessment

With submission for assessment due in the second half of September and holidays having taken up most of the second half of July and the first half of August I have now entered a frenetic period of activity in order to complete the course work in time.

·         Following on from my tutor’s comments and my own observations I have produced a revised photo book (see below). No further work will be carried out in this area.

·         I have made a final decision on which images/prints to submit for my major project portfolio and am getting some “trial” exhibition prints produced by two companies (see below).

·         Following on from the changes to my portfolio images I have made some minor changes to the multimedia presentation, which is now complete and ready for submission.

Photo Book

My tutor kindly offered to comment on the first draft of my photo book. His very helpful suggestions, which related both to the design of the book and to the image content, combined with my own reflections on having received the book from the printers (“Blurb”), encouraged me to make revisions to the style and content of the book. One or two of the images were not “up to scratch” and this allowed me to make a final choice regarding which images/prints to include in my final portfolio.

Having made modifications to the text and images, a revised photo book was printed by “Blurb”: the front cover is reproduced below.

Front cover of my revised photo book (against a black background)

All the portfolio images are incorporated into the book in (7x5) landscape format and a few additional images use this format too. The result is a rather orthodox and clinical feel to the book’s design. However, I wanted to show consistency in the different sections of the submission (images/prints, multimedia, photo book). One “letterbox” and one square format image are included in the book: neither of these is included in the portfolio. I’m happy now that the photo book represents a fair overview of my project work which, in conjunction with the multimedia presentation, will provide necessary insight into why and how I carried out the project. The photo book will be submitted for assessment without further modification and I will purchase further copies for personal use and possibly to accompany a future exhibition.

Portfolio Images and Prints

I finished practical work in July. All the portfolio images for section 1 had been chosen by then, as had most of the images for section 2. I had hoped to complete the portfolio with a strong image of a bird in natural habitat, (such as a reed bed) on a nature reserve. Unfortunately, for various reasons, a suitable image could not be produced or reproduced. This necessitated a slight re-ordering of the final few images and the inclusion of a photograph of wild swans being fed at Welney Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust reserve. These changes are reflected in the second photo book. One advantage of using the Welney image is that it provides a link between the two sections of the portfolio and reinforces the direct connection between people and birds that was evident in the first section.

I spent a lot of time researching how to go about producing a print portfolio. This involved producing A4 prints of a variety of my images on standard matt and glossy and “fine art” A4 papers, using my own printer. My tutor had a look at some of these prints. It became clear that, for the subject matter involved, using specialised fine art paper would not offer a significant advantage over “standard” archival print paper. Indeed, some of the best results on my (Epson) printer were achieved using “Permajet” inkjet gloss (271gsm) (this is my favoured combination for competition prints). After further research I chose to have the portfolio images printed on C-type gloss archival paper, costing about £10.00 per print. At the time of writing I am getting a small selection of prints produced by two separate companies. Assuming that the results are satisfactory I will choose one company to print the remaining images in early September.

Multimedia Presentation

I have made slight changes to the multimedia presentation, in order to incorporate the final portfolio image set. The videos and accompanying sound remain unaltered. My only remaining challenge here will be to ensure that the 238Mb presentation copies satisfactorily to disc, so that the assessors can watch it! A screen grab of the opening slide from the presentation is shown below.

Multimedia Presentation: Opening Slide

Future Work

I have updated my logbook/blog with details of exhibition reviews, status reports etc. and plan no further work here. In addition to putting my print portfolio together I will write two more blog posts / logbook entries, one describing how the major project has developed and changed since its inception and the second discussing what I have learnt during the two years that I have been working on the course. Finally comes all the indexing and organising that occurs with every assessment submission……